Lloyd's List is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Will shareholders pay the price for John Fredriksen’s legacy-seeking strategy?

Euronav’s largest shareholder explains why Frontline’s merger pursuit via a voluntary share exchange ‘will lead to nothing’

‘It’s basically exchanging shares of Euronav into shares of Frontline. Then you have to have faith in the John Fredriksen franchise and his name and his legacy continuing,’ Alexander Saverys tells Lloyd’s List

THE numbers don’t add up for a successful voluntary share exchange that will ultimately merge Frontline and Euronav.

That is the view of Euronav’s largest shareholder, which remains opposed to combining the two tanker giants.

Instead, any combined entity would have to operate two standalone tanker companies, presenting numerous governance and conflict-of-interest problems to the detriment of shareholders, Compagnie Maritime Belge chief executive Alexander Saverys told Lloyd’s List.

“It’s puzzling to me that people who know how to calculate the percentages still push ahead with something that they know will lead to nothing,” he said.

CMB is the largest shareholder in Euronav, with 78-year-old Frontline tanker billionaire John Fredriksen the second-biggest.

The Belgian private shipowner was expanding on objections to yesterday’s “surprise” announcement by Frontline and Euronav to launch a share exchange in the fourth quarter at a ratio of 1.45 Frontline shares for one Euronav share.

If all shareholders participated and accepted the offer, CMB still had 20% of the combined entity, Mr Saverys said.

Even with 80% it was very unlikely that the votes to approve any legal merger at an extraordinary general meeting would reach 75%, he said.

“History shows we never have had 80% attendance at a general assembly. If they were quite certain they could push through a merger they would have gone to an AGM, which they have not done.

“The question is, ‘Why are they doing this?’ The decision the shareholders will have to make is: ‘Does it represent good value for me?’

“Do I want to be part of Frontline, because the merger without our support isn’t going to happen.

“So, it's basically exchanging your shares of Euronav into shares of Frontline. Then you have to have faith in the John Fredriksen franchise and his name and his legacy continuing.”

Frontline’s founder and tanker tycoon Mr Fredriksen began to build his stake in Euronav in September 2021, prompting CMB to rebuy shares to regain holdings after selling out 18 months earlier.

At the same time, Mr Fredriksen emerged in May as the biggest, but unwanted, shareholder in tanker company International Seaways with a 16% holding.

The two purchases coincide with a tanker market emerging from a protracted downturn and Mr Fredriksen’s long-trailed preparations to leave an easy-to-liquidate legacy for his two daughters, who have not joined the business.

Mr Fredriksen has a 40% share in Frontline and 18.6% in Euronav.

The Saverys family — brothers Alexander and Ludovic and father Marc — opposed the merger, which they have characterised as “old” versus “new” ways to manage the energy transition for tanker shipping.

“We’re not going to sell the tankers one minute before the market recovery,” Mr Saverys said. “We want to use these cash flows in the next few years to reinvest in diversifying the fleet being less dependent on oil.

“We can keep the VLCC and suezmax fleet definitely in play for the next couple of years, use the cash that comes out of it, either the charter money that comes in or by the sale of assets, and then reinvest in container shipping, in ammonia carriage, in dry bulk, in offshore wind, and everything we're doing already now, with CMB.”

If a solution wasn’t found, the resulting structure would be “very negative and not only for us, but also for Frontline and Euronav shareholders”.

“The big danger of the situation they are pushing for is that you have two competing companies, Frontline on the one hand, Euronav on the other,” he said. “For every decision they take will have to go through a kind of conflict-of-interest procedure or governance committee oversight because one company will control the other.

“The conflicts of interest are so huge.”

Lars Barstard, the chief executive of Frontline, said that a voluntary exchange offer was a “very democratic avenue for the proposed merger”.

If all shares were tendered for exchange, Frontline shareholders would have 45% of the combined company and Euronav the remaining 55%.

“John Fredriksen and Frontline have built shareholder value for decades and strongly believe in the shareholder rights to govern the strategic direction of a company,” he said.

Related Content

Topics

  • Related Companies
  • UsernamePublicRestriction

    Register

    LL1141584

    Ask The Analyst

    Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
    Ask The Analyst

    Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

    All fields are required.

    Please make sure all fields are completed.

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please enter a valid e-mail address

    Please enter a valid Phone Number

    Ask your question to our analysts

    Cancel