Lloyd's List is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Ports likely to struggle with future fuel needs

Class societies are increasingly looking at nuclear power — a hard sell to the public — amid concerns about the safety and supply of ammonia or hydrogen

Concerns over safety, handling and public perception of future fuels will be increasingly in the spotlight. Huge investments in ports and modernising safety and training regulations are also needed, an industry event has heard

DECARBONISATION will be a huge challenge for ports, according to the director of the UK’s second-biggest container port.

Associated British Ports director Alastair Welch told a Lloyd’s Register panel his port was investing millions of dollars in the UK’s first commercial shore power installation.

He said getting enough power for one cruiseship had meant taking over Southampton’s biggest industrial site, and cobbling together other power sources.

Finding enough to run multiple ships at the same time would require much more government investment, and would cover just a tiny part of a ship’s overall carbon dioxide emissions, Mr Welch said.

Environmental regulations, logistical hurdles safety risks, and public opinion were also important.

“If I think I’m going to have huge stores of hydrogen in the city centre in Southampton, that’s probably unlikely — and equally the same with ammonia,” he said.

He added that in the US shore power was routinely generated from coal power stations, “which is frankly staggering”.

UK Maritime & Coastguard Agency chief executive Brian Johnson said hydrogen, ammonia, and nuclear power — which he considered the only realistic “destination” fuels for shipping — had “massive implications” for ports in the middle of big cities, as well as national security and seafarer training.

Mr Johnson said the fuel transition would require “hopelessly inadequate” port regulation and seafarer training that “looks 40 or 50 years out of date” to be modernised.

“We’ve got a huge task ahead of us, and we’ve got to do that in a way that doesn’t make the regulatory burden overwhelming,” he said.

Lloyd’s Register marine and offshore director Mark Darley said cost and societal readiness were bigger challenges than technology when it came to future fuels.

Mr Darley said shipping should follow the aviation industry’s success in cutting its fuel use by 20% through better use of data for route planning and operations.

Digitalisation and decarbonisation should no longer be seen as separate goals, he said.

Related Content

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL1138233

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel