Lloyd's List is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By


Mike Burns

Latest From Mike Burns

BP's Clair platform oil leak adds to energy market woes

Leak raises serious legal implications

Energy Specialty

Hanjin Shipping insolvency and insurance implications

Can cargo insurers expect an avalanche of claims as a result of Hanjin Shipping’s demise?

The Intelligence Insurance

Tianjin blast set to have seismic impact on insurance industry

Global insurance implications from port explosions cannot be overstated

Containers Ports and Logistics

The worst may not be over for Costa Concordia underwriters

The criminal conviction of Francesco Schettino for manslaughter could mean more bad news for marine insurers

Specialty Marine

A shifting burden in coverage cases

MARINE insurance disputes commonly require examination of technical and expert issues, which can prompt situations of ‘paralysis by over-analysis’. However, the English courts have traditionally followed a commonsense approach to unravelling factually complex coverage claims.

Regulation Europe

Court decision in Achilleas case gives food for thought

LIKE all good sagas, there is a twist at the end, but upon reflection, one wonders if the final denouement was ever really in doubt? And so, as the ink is drying on the judgment of the House of Lords decision in the Achilleas*, its impact for shipping interests and for English contract law is being digested, writes Mike Burns.Until the Lords’ ruling last week, successive decisions up to the Court of Appeal had shattered the pre-Achilleas acceptance in the shipping industry that in late redelivery situations, the measure of damages a shipowner could claim was limited to an increase in the market rate during the overrun period. Lost profits were not recoverable.For the Court of Appeal, the answer was deceptively simple. There was no rule specific to shipping and redelivery disputes. Under long-established breach of contract decisions in Hadley v Baxendale (1854) and The Heron II(1967), a claimant, shipowner or not, was entitled to recover losses foreseeable to result from a breach.

See All