Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Hong Kong crew change suspension dismays unions

An open letter to key government officials expressed unions’ disappointment with decision to suspend crew changes in the territory and urged a quick resumption of the service once the coronavirus outbreak in the city eases. The unions also spoke out against what they called a media smear campaign blaming crew change as a source of the third wave of outbreaks

The unions said they expected the government to improve the current policy and advocate the appropriate crew change in Hong Kong under the principle of securing public health and safety

TWO seamens’ unions in Hong Kong have expressed disappointment with the government’s decision to suspend crew changes at the port for vessels without cargo operations.

In an open letter to Hong Kong chief executive Carrie Lam, secretary for transport and housing Frank Fan, chief secretary Matthew Cheung and director of the Marine Department Agnes Wong, the Merchant Navy Officers’ Guild-Hong Kong and Amalgamated Union of Seafarers, Hong Kong, said they were all “disappointed” with the government’s decision and strongly opposed “malicious attacks and the media smear campaign towards crew change as a major source of the Covid-19 pandemic”.

The two unions further said they “severely condemn those irresponsible and spiteful comments against ship crew and crew change practices”.

They pointed out that since the third wave of the pandemic broke out in Hong Kong over a week ago, no infections had occurred among frontline workers who have had close contacts with ships’ crews, including pick-up staff, crew from vessel transit service launches, staff at hotels providing temporary accommodation or anyone else associated with the crew change process.

Noting that only a small number of new infections came from the list of groups exempted from quarantine, which include air crew as well as cross-boundary truck and coach drivers to Macao and the mainland and certain categories of business people with manufacturing operations on the mainland, among others, the unions said it was unfair to blame seafarers and crew change operations for the recurrence of the pandemic in Hong Kong.

“Our unions expect the government to improve the current policy and advocate the appropriate crew change in Hong Kong, under the principle of securing public health and safety,” they added.

The two seafarers’ representative bodies strongly appealed for the “timely review” of the crew-change policy and testing and quarantine arrangements as soon as the outbreak situation improves in Hong Kong.

Hong Kong suspended crew changes for vessels not undergoing cargo operations in the port on July 27 as the government came under increasing pressure amid a third wave of coronavirus infections that have seen more than 100 new infections a day for over a week.

Related Content

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL1133299

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel