Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

The week in charts: China port calls slow as tanker freight futures spike

Cosco Shipping Ports chairman warns of short-lived recovery in container volumes, while shore-based crude storage expected to fill up quickly, bolstering tanker forward freight agreement contracts

Signs of the slowdown in container volumes are already starting to emerge in China, despite the recent recovery in production as factories resume work

DATA from Lloyd’s List Intelligence show that the number of calls by container-related vessels to Shanghai and Yangshan dipped back down in week 12 following a period of recovery since the slump following Chinese New Year.

Feng Boming, chairman of Hong Kong-listed Cosco Shipping Ports, this week said shipping companies were prepared for the virus impact from China but did not foresee the disease turning into a pandemic, which could make the current recovery in container volumes rather short-lived.

He added that cargo being shipped now was ordered before the virus outbreak and will drain in May. He urged shipping companies to find quick and effective solutions, including cost reduction, to tackle the possible shrink in revenue.

(If watching on a mobile device, select Open Media where relevant to view the graph)

 

Freight futures

New signals have emerged that oil traders anticipate shore-based crude storage to quickly fill up as the value of tanker forward freight agreement contracts for the next six months soared 22% in one day.

Tanker forward freight values

The spike in freight futures provides further insight into market sentiment as the scope of the oil demand collapse and the scale of a looming crude and products surplus begins to emerge. The spike suggests traders and oil companies expect floating storage to surge in coming weeks, pushing up rates for tankers even as global demand for crude falls.

The second-quarter contract for very large crude carriers shipping 280,000 tonnes from Saudi Arabia to China — the most frequently traded FFA — closed at $25.99 per tonne on March 25, according to the Baltic Exchange. The contract gained 24% from the prior day and is 260% higher than its  value at the beginning of the month.

The third-quarter FFA contract on the same route is now at $16.42 per tonne, up from $13.56 on March 24. The less-liquid second-quarter FFA contract for suezmax tankers showed a smaller gain of 11% on the previous day.

Bahri-chartered VLCCs on the move

After Saudi Arabia pledged to flood the market with crude oil to retain market share earlier this month, state shipping company Bahri chartered some 25 VLCCs on the spot market between March 9-20 to load extra cargoes, resulting in the tanker rates spike seen in mid-March.

These VLCCs are now sailing to Saudi Arabia, as can be seen in the map from Lloyd’s List Intelligence, with loading dates starting from March 25 to April 2.

But with refineries worldwide cutting runs and the crude surplus rising, its unclear whether there will be buyers for cargoes to be loaded on the armada of VLCCs due to more people working from home and decisions taking longer.

At least four of the Bahri-chartered VLCCs are heading for the Red Sea port of Ain Sukhna where the national oil company has storage facilities, but a further 10 are sailing for the US Gulf, where refineries there are already reducing utilisation levels.

Scrubber cancellations

Dry bulk and containership owners are among the first to scrap plans to retrofit or install scrubbers, according to Alphatanker, which forecasts a “flood of cancellations” as cost-cutting and the erosion of marine fuel oil premiums render the sulphur abatement technology redundant.

Singapore bunkers prices VLSFO versus HSFO

The price of 0.5% very low sulphur fuel oil now used by some 70% of the international global fleet has plunged by 278% in Singapore since the beginning of 2020, when it was as high as $653.75 per tonne, according assessments compiled by price reporting agency Argus Media.

The difference in price between compliant VLSFO and 3.5% high sulphur fuel oil used by vessels with scrubbers has shrunk to $50 per tonne, from more than $400 per tonne earlier this year, according to Alphatanker. Argus Media prices for Singapore today assess the spread as $64.50 per tonne.

Related Content

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL1131713

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel