Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Total readies for six month low-sulphur transition

The transition will pick up in earnest from next month as the market comes to grips with new and existing options to comply with the IMO global sulphur cap. Total sees this as a signpost marking the start of the mandatory low-sulphur transition for the marine fuel industry

Total wants to maintain ‘flexibility’ either sourcing directly from its refineries or blending heavy fuel oil and distillates to help its clients navigate the transition

TOTAL’S marine fuels unit is gearing up for an expected six-month long, low-sulphur transition starting from this October.

Total Marine Fuels Global Solutions global sales and business development director Jesper Rosenkrans told Lloyd’s List during an exclusive interview that bunkering of fuel oil with 0.5% sulphur, or very-low sulphur fuel oil, “will pick up in a meaningful way” in October.

That will be one signpost marking the start of the mandatory low-sulphur transition for the marine fuel industry, which Mr Rosenkrans said, is widely expected to last for six months.

From January 1, 2020, the International Maritime Organization’s 0.5% regulatory cap on sulphur in marine fuels on board ships with no pre-installed scrubbers — the IMO 2020 regulation — will take effect.

Two oil-based alternatives, VLSFO and marine gas oil, are commonly regarded as compliant alternatives to fuel oil with 3.5% sulphur, or high-sulphur fuel oil — still the dominant fuel type in the pre-IMO 2020 market.

Speaking to Lloyd’s List on the sidelines of IBC Asia’s 9th Biennial Bunker conference in Singapore, Mr Rosenkrans describes the bunker market as undergoing “a discovery mode” as players size up the compliant options.

To begin with, shipping lines are still trying to ascertain the availability and price of VLSFO products at ports around the world.

Mr Rosenkrans thought that against this background, some shipping lines may opt for marine gas oil at three to six months into the transition.

Where the fuel availability issue is concerned, Total has sought to reassure its shipping clients that it expects to supply VLSFO at least at the ports where it has been supplying HSFO before IMO 2020.

Lloyd’s List understands that the supermajor operates several refineries in Europe capable of pumping out VLSFO.

Mr Rosenkrans pointed out however that Total will tap “different sources of VLSFO” to supply into the marine fuels market.

Total, as with other supermajors and refinery operators, will look to supply VLSFO products that come from blending of HSFO with distillates.

VLSFO sourced directly from refineries is commonly perceived as being more stable in quality compared with blended alternatives.

Mr Rosenkrans acknowledged that the consistency in quality would probably be higher from a refined product.

But he also qualified that a refined product will not always be the same given the refinery may require a change in its crude slate from month to month.

“Blending also takes place in a refinery, so the distinction is less clear between the two,” he explained.

The Total executive reiterated that the supermajor would want to maintain flexibility in sourcing VLSFO to provide “best quality products at best prices possible” to its customers.

“If a customer wants a customised, very specific VLSFO, it is technically possible to supply but all aspects including costs would need to be considered,” he added.

Related Content

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL1129061

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel