Lloyd's List is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Black Sea arrivals rising amid changing trade dynamics

Inbound sailings to Black Sea ports are up 16% on pre-invasion levels, but some shipowners are more affected by the war than others

Trade in the Black Sea is changing as shipowners adapt to the new wartime norm 

VESSEL calls at key Black Sea ports are have rebounded to levels above where they were before the Russian invasion of Ukraine, but many shipowners remain unwilling or unable to send ships to the region because of sanctions.
 
Commercial vessels made 10,550 calls to Black Sea ports in Russia, Turkey, Bulgaria, Romania, Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova in the second quarter according to vessel tracking data from Lloyd’s List Intelligence.
 
This was up 16% on the first quarter, which saw the outbreak of war in Ukraine and the introduction of sanctions against Russia.

Georgia and Ukraine are the only countries whose ports have recorded a fall in inbound sailings, largely due to the closure of Ukraine’s major terminals by Russian blockades. Nevertheless, port calls have been rising since April as its Danube ports increase capacity.

Seaborne trade has increased in Moldova and Romania, in part because of their role in moving supplies into and out of Ukraine.

Russia has also seen growth in ship arrivals, despite businesses deciding to cut ties with the country and a raft of sanctions from western governments. 

But sanctions have altered the ownership patterns of vessels calling at Black Sea terminals.

 

 

Ships owned by companies based in Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Italy, the United Kingdom and Germany have limited their calls to Russia.

German-owned vessels, for example, recorded 68 arrivals in the first quarter, dropping to just four in the three months that followed.

Three bulk carriers called at Taman and Tuapse in April while one product tanker landed in Novorossiysk in June. All the vessels were flagged to Liberia at the time of arrival.

Not all European owners have felt the same compunction to avoid the region, however.

Shipowners from Greece, Switzerland and the Netherlands have all increased exposure to above pre-invasion levels.

Greek-owned tankers have stepped in to lift Russian-origin cargoes to fill the gap left by European and US companies that have terminated relationships with Russian entities.

 

 

Meanwhile, the pattern of trading across the Black Sea has also changed since the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine.

Black Sea port calls from European and Asian-owned vessels are sharply down, driven by a decrease in trade with both Russia and Ukraine,  as the conflict, sanctions and operational challenges all take their toll.

Other shipowners, however, have stepped up to facilitate alternative trade routes that have emerged since the outbreak of the war.

The Romanian fleet, for example, has increased calls to Ukraine’s operating ports along the Danube as well as Turkey.

 

Lebanon-owned ships, on the other hand, are sailing more often to Romania, Russia and Turkey. Ships with beneficial owners based in Lebanon recorded 128 arrivals during the first quarter, growing to 185 over the next three months.

The Turkish fleet, which accounted for nearly 25% of all Black Sea port calls in the second quarter, has also seen a bump in activity. Turkey-owned ships logged 2,593 arrivals between April and June.

The fleet has seen more calls to every country that borders the Black Sea, except for Ukraine. The most significant growth is in Moldova and Romania.

 

Related Content

Topics

  • Related Places
  • UsernamePublicRestriction

    Register

    LL1141687

    Ask The Analyst

    Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
    Ask The Analyst

    Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

    All fields are required.

    Please make sure all fields are completed.

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please enter a valid e-mail address

    Please enter a valid Phone Number

    Ask your question to our analysts

    Cancel