Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Gulf of Guinea antipiracy system takes shape

Simon Church, who managed the Maritime Security Centre Horn of Africa for EU Naval Force Somalia, says the new Gulf of Guinea Shade forum has delivered transparency and accountability previously lacking in international and regional efforts

The Maritime Collaboration Forum Gulf of Guinea Shade forum hopes to mirror the approach used to fight Somali piracy by co-ordinating different international and regional navies to respond more quickly to attacks

INTERNATIONAL efforts to co-ordinate the fight against piracy in the Gulf of Guinea are gaining momentum, according to the former shipping adviser to EU Naval Force Somalia.

Simon Church, the former director of Maritime Security Centre Horn of Africa, told Lloyd’s List that countries, navies, and west African states are seeking to mirror the approach used successfully in Somalia.

In February of the past year, Nigeria, through its Maritime Administration and Safety Agency, known as Nimasa, and the Inter-regional Co-ordination Centre of the Yaoundé Code of Conduct, which represents 21 countries of the Gulf of Guinea region, signed a memorandum of understanding to establish a regionally led Shared Awareness and Deconfliction, known as Shade, forum.

The G7 ++ Friends of the Gulf of Guinea group of nations appointed Mr Church as special adviser to the forum’s co-chairs.

Mr Church said the forum was designed to help co-ordination between navies and information sharing centres in the area to respond to pirate attacks, by establishing best practices for reporting incidents and letting navies know who is doing what.

The forum started in July 2021 and meets every two months. It has since had four plenary sessions, which include all its stakeholders, including the 25 Yaoundé Code of Conduct signatory countries, 20 navies that have worked in the Gulf of Guinea, and the international shipping industry.

Three working groups meet online between plenaries; 18 meetings have been held so far.

“The intention behind that intense, ambitious timeline is to deliver output and deliver operational effect,” Mr Church said.

He said one of Shade’s biggest successes so far has been to replicate the Mercury communication platform used in the Indian Ocean for letting navies notify and speak to each other on an unclassified internet platform.

Mr Church says the system, called Solarta, let the Russian navy respond quickly to the October 25 attack on the containership MSC Lucia (IMO: 8413887), chasing the pirates away before they could take any hostages.

“The system has gone online, is being used … and has proved to be effective in preventing attacks becoming hostage situations,” Mr Church said.

“And that is a big accomplishment in the space of six months.”

The emphasis on shared awareness is because no one country answers to another; the forum cannot tell navy ships what to do. If more ships are needed, it cannot marshal them like a country could.

The mix of legal jurisdictions and authorities makes the Gulf of Guinea harder for international navies to operate in than Somalia, a failed state with no coast guard. Navies cannot chase pirates across state sea borders without the states' permissions.

Faced with these constraints, Shade seeks instead to enable co-ordination between the ships that are already there to best deter pirates. It can find where the gaps are and help the different parties agree on solutions.

“It’s not supposed to be prescriptive; it’s intended to allow nations to think about how to improve their own practices,” Mr Church said.

Despite this, Mr Church said the system has brought transparency and accountability and cut the amount of time taken to respond to pirate attacks.

It should also lay the groundwork for regional countries like Nigeria to own the problem and take charge of the response, with help from better-resourced foreign powers.

Mr Church was confident those regional countries would soon take a bigger role, citing Nigeria’s long-awaited Deep Blue project, a set of investments in coastal surveillance, training, and security kit.

The Shade forum has made strides, but there was still more work to be done building trust between regional and international navies, he said.

Lloyd’s List has reported warnings that Denmark’s capture and subsequent release of three suspected pirates had angered Nigerians and risked straining the relationship between its navy and the international shipping industry.

Mr Church said actions seen as unilateral did not help build the trust needed for the forum to work: “We continue to encourage all navies to work together in that collaborative philosophy. We are working towards that. That's all I would say on it.”

A goal of the forum is that when an attack happens, an international navy would pass information to a littoral state, leading to pirates caught, tried, and convicted, establishing a best-practice model and a deterrent to pirates.

“We’re not that far away from that,” Mr Church said. “But what we do in this forum is absolutely vital so that trust is established. And once it is, I think we’re all going to be in a better place.”

Piracy watchdog the International Maritime Bureau reported 34 incidents in the Gulf of Guinea in 20211, down from 81 the year before, and 57 crew kidnapped in seven incidents, down from 130 in 2020.

The IMB said the decrease was because of “vigorous action taken by authorities” and commended the “robust actions of the Royal Danish Navy”.

But security sources are divided on why incidents have fallen, saying it is too soon to tell whether it was down to better enforcement or political and economic factors within Nigeria.

Related Content

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL1139775

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel