Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

The week in charts: China congestion boosts bulker rates | Counting the cost of the EU’s carbon bill | Box rates stabilise

Lloyd’s List’s weekly showing of the data and figures behind our news, analysis and markets coverage

Bulker freight rates have skyrocketed with congestion at Chinese anchorages showing little sign of easing, while new research highlights the cost burden for those bearing the brunt of the European Union’s emissions trading system

SUSTAINED congestion off the coast of China has prompted a surge in dry bulk freight rates as capacity is constrained.

Last week, Lloyd’s List Intelligence data showed 679 bulkers caught up in the logjam, representing around 5.5% of the dry bulk fleet, or 1 in 17 vessels.

That compared with 599 vessels, or 5.7% of the fleet above 15,000 dwt, in August.

Supramaxes were the most affected by the pile-up by number of vessels, at 175 for 9.9m dwt, followed by panamaxes and kamsarmaxes at 169 for 13.2m dwt, and handymaxes at 119 for 5.1m dwt.

In terms of capacity, capesizes were the most affected, at 20m dwt, or 108 vessels.



As a result, the average weighted capesize time charter surged to $61,683 per day at the close of Thursday (September 23) on the Baltic Exchange, the highest level for the 180,000 dwt assessment, which launched in 2014. 



 

Counting the cost of the EU’s carbon bill 

The shipping industry has still to appreciate the implications of who must pay under European Union’s emissions trading system, according to shipbroker Affinity Shipping.

Indeed, lessors in China that fund hundreds of new ships will count as beneficial owners who must buy carbon allowances under EU proposal, which begins in 2023.

The EU’s proposed emissions trading system for shipping would raise nearly $5.9bn annually at current carbon costs and comprise as much as 56% of the period charter rate for the biggest tankers sailing in the region, Affinity Shipping research shows.

Under Affinity’s calculations, a suezmax tanker that was chartered out for a year on a rate of $15,500 per day would have a carbon price of $8,660 added to the rate each day if it was trading wholly inside EU waters. That rate would halve to $4,330 daily for an international voyage.

The scheme sees shipowners pay 20% for emissions in 2023, rising to 45% in 2024, 70% by 2025 and 100% after that.

 

 

 

 

Box rates stabilise 

Some containerised freight indices are showing signs that the period of rapid freight rate gains may be coming to an end.

Figures from the Shanghai Shipping Exchange showed little change in freight rates last week, with the Shanghai Containerised Freight Index up just 0.5%.
Rates on the transpacific were little changed at $6,322 per feu, while there was even a slight 0.2% fall on the Asia-Mediterranean trade.

It was the second consecutive week that the SCFI had registered no change on the transpacific and sub-2% changes on other key routes.


 

 

Drewry’s World Container Index also remained steady at $10,377.19 per feu, with rates on Shanghai to Rotterdam, Rotterdam to Shanghai, Shanghai to Los Angeles and Rotterdam to New York all remaining stable at the previous week’s level.

Related Content

Topics

  • Related Companies
  • Related Places
  • UsernamePublicRestriction

    Register

    LL1138330

    Ask The Analyst

    Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
    Ask The Analyst

    Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

    All fields are required.

    Please make sure all fields are completed.

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please enter a valid e-mail address

    Please enter a valid Phone Number

    Ask your question to our analysts

    Cancel