Lloyd's List is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

From the News Desk: Crew changes, climate and a rising China

China’s blocking of Australian coal, and now some gas, could further reshape seaborne trade flows. Our Special Report shows how much influence China already has

Shipping frustrated at unpredictable crew-change rules, intensifying debate over emissions regulations, and why the US-China trade war still matters

UNPREDICTABLE crew-change rule changes in South Africa continue to worsen the crew-change crisis as countries tighten travel curbs in response to India’s coronavirus surge.

With global vaccine rollouts likely to be uneven, the crisis may get even worse. There are more virus outbreaks on ships, where access to medical help is limited.

Among those stranded are the crews of the 20 bulkers stuck off China’s coast after China banned Australian coal last year.

That political spat may be getting worse, with news that Chinese officials have told two liquefied natural gas importers to avoid buying further cargoes from Australia.

Fears that China will escalate tensions last week caused a dip in bulker freight rates (though they have since recovered).

Who should pay for the green transition?

Now that shipping’s two-year-old plan for a fuel tax to fund green research has made it as far as the International Maritime Organization, it is under scrutiny.

China, India, Brazil and other developing countries (can we really call China that?) have objected to the flat $2-a-tonne levy, saying richer countries should pay a bigger share.

Shipping has defended the plan, saying it would not disproportionally burden poorer countries. They emphasise that the fund is not meant to act as a “market-based measure” — one designed to tilt the economics to favour future fuels.

But such a market-based measure is exactly what environment groups want. They dismiss the R&D fund as too puny, and reckon shipping should instead use its scarce negotiating time to back the Marshall Islands’ proposal to tax CO2 at $100 per tonne.

The World Shipping Council thought this criticism “defeatist”.

The IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee refused even to discuss MBMs when it last met in November, so politically contentious is the topic. Expect fireworks at its next meeting in June.

China in focus

In our latest Special Report, China editor Cichen Shen outlines why the US-China tariff war still matters for shipping.

We examine China’s growing thirst for Iranian oil, and how this is frustrating US efforts to curb Iran’s economy.

Its hunger for raw materials has long propped up the dry bulk market. But how long can this last?

LNG’s value in lessening environmental harm faces growing scrutiny. But China’s plans may see thousands more LNG ships along its key waterway under an emissions control plan.

LNG trade between China and Southeast Asia is also increasing, spurring a race to find cheaper ways to ship and store the fuel in smaller volumes.

Read the full Special Report here.

Related Content

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL1136732

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel