Dry bulk market fragile as sulphur cap takes its toll
Despite the Baltic Dry Index moving up by two points on Friday to 774, market participants think the outlook is turning dim as the International Maritime Organization sulphur cap rule takes its toll. Producers of iron ore and coal can expect a 40% increase in freight cost overnight with no ability to recover those costs
Stifel analyst Benjamin Nolan suggests there is a need to either to reduce the cost of freight or increase the price of the commodity being sold to re-balance the dry bulk market
THE crash in dry bulk freight rates since the beginning of the year has been dramatic, but it was nonetheless expected owing to the upcoming Chinese New Year holidays and seasonal weakness.
The seasonal factors that drive down the Baltic Dry Index in early January include southern hemisphere foul weather, a tendency for power companies in China to schedule their buying at year-end ahead of the lunar new year holiday, and owners of dry bulk newbuildings scheduled to be delivered at the end of the fourth quarter waiting until January to launch their ships.
Although the BDI was up two points to reach 774 on Friday, having fallen every single day since December 3 last year, the recovery is just a respite and not a turnaround as the abnormally early start of seasonal weakness is due to the inflationary impact of the International Maritime Organization’s sulphur cap rule having a knock-on effect on commodity demand.
The rate crash has left the market breathless, with freight rates across all segments testing new lows, particularly for capesize vessels. A spot average of $4,000 per day is insufficient to cover the daily operating costs of the ships, according to Stifel. About 43 days ago, capesize rates averaged about $26,000 per day.
Specifically, the landing price of 62% fine iron ore in China was about $85 a tonne at the beginning of the year.
As of January 1, those ships not fitted with exhaust gas scrubbers would have had to start buying low sulphur fuel, which is about $300 per tonne more expensive.
“Factoring in average capesize consumption and voyage durations, this translates into an increase in fuel cost of about $4.50 per tonne of iron ore,” Stifel estimates. The impact on thermal coal is similar.
Thus, overnight, a producer of iron ore or thermal coal, which is collectively 29% of all dry bulk trade, would have seen a 40% increase in freight costs with no immediate ability to recover those costs through higher commodity prices, it noted.
Stifel analyst Benjamin Nolan suggests that there are only two mechanisms to re-balance the market: reduce the cost of freight or increase the price of the commodity being sold.
Still, “a quick way to accomplish both is to simply do nothing,” he said.
“By booking fewer cargoes, the balance of supply and demand for dry bulk ships will quickly swing toward oversupplied, while the inventory levels of the respective commodities will begin to fall, eventually pushing up prices.”
Assuming that is in fact the tactic being deployed in the current market, it seems to be working.
Iron ore prices are up about $2.50 since the first of the year and freight rates are down by even more than the inflationary impact on fuel prices.
Mr Nolan acknowledged that the reason why dry bulk ships have been affected, while ships like tankers and containerships do not seem to have been, is that the relative value of the respective cargoes are very different.
“A cargo of crude may be worth $130m and freight is a tiny fraction of cost. A cargo of iron ore is only worth $15m.”