Lloyd's List is part of the Business Intelligence Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By


Rise of tanker debt has banks concerned again

The continued rise of debt has not gone un-noticed by the key banks holding it, while for reasons still unexplained by the requests

THE US Federal Maritime Commission has voted to reject the Tripartite Agreement proposed by Japanese carriers NYK, K Line and MOL.

The carriers, which have agreed to merge their container operations by next April, were seeking permission to share information and conduct joint negotiations with third-party businesses in the US in advance of their merger.

But the FMC held that these provisions would violate “gun-jumping” laws that forbid the sharing of competitively sensitive information or the premature combining of the parties.

“This decision by the FMC in no way precludes the Japanese carriers from merging their container trade business units into a single stand-alone company,” said commissioner William Doyle.

“Rather, the vote recognises that the FMC cannot approve certain actions that would allow the three Japanese companies to act as a merged entity prior to actually merging. In order to receive the benefits of a merger, you need to first merge.”

The Shipping Act did not provide the FMC with authority to even review and approve mergers, Mr Doyle said. The commission had continuing regulatory oversight over agreements between established ocean common carriers and marine terminal operators.

The proposed Tripartite Agreement sought authority to transfer shares or ownership interests in US-based marine terminals owned and/or operated by the Japanese lines.

“In as much as the pre-coordination activity of the liners is beyond the scope of FMC’s jurisdiction, this same rationale applies to marine terminal assets in the US,” Mr Doyle said.






Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts